Showing all results for category “Writing and Speaking”

Ryerson Provides Commentary For Law360 Article Regarding Toxic Tort Suits

January 27, 2015 / Writing and Speaking

Clausen Miller P.C. senior partner Thomas H. Ryerson recently provided Law360 with commentary regarding an Illinois Appeals court’s recent ruling on Illinois Tool Works, Inc. According to Law360, the court ruled that three insurers must defend Illinois Tool Works Inc.

Kearney Co-Authors Law Review Article

January 22, 2015 / Writing and Speaking

CM partner Kimbley A. Kearney has co-authored “Ancient Duties, Modern Perspectives: Recent Developments In The Law Of Maintenance And Cure” which is soon to be published in the Tulane Law Review.

No Coverage For Telephone Solicitations Under Liability Policy

January 13, 2015 / Writing and Speaking

The 1st District Appellate Court recently held that a professional liability policy issued to an insurance broker covering negligent acts “in rendering services for others” did not cover liability arising from automated, pre-recorded telephone calls made for soliciting business.

Binding Arbitration Provision In Insurance Code Ruled Unconstitutional

January 9, 2014 / Writing and Speaking

By Don R. Sampen, published, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin [January 9, 2014]

Binding Arbitration Provision In Insurance Code Ruled Unconstitutional

The 1st District Appellate Court recently found unconstitutional a section of the Illinois Insurance Code requiring the mandatory binding arbitration of physical damage subrogation claims between insurers,

What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Subrogee: When Comparative Fault May Not Reduce Subrogation Recovery

July 10, 2013 / Writing and Speaking

Introduction

Where comparative fault is attributable to a subrogation plaintiff, it may reduce recovery. But, just as a defendant might assert lack of foreseeability or failure of a plaintiff to meet its own obligations,

Washington Supreme Court Addresses Ensuing Loss Provisions

July 10, 2012 / Writing and Speaking

The Washington Supreme Court recently issued two decisions addressing ensuing loss provisions involving various exclusions in first-party property insurance policies. We provide a brief analysis below concerning these important cases.

Vision One, LLC v.

Early Notice to Adverse Parties in Subrogation

March 10, 2009 / Writing and Speaking

If you are a subrogation professional, you likely know that it is good practice to provide adverse ties with early notice of the loss.  Here are some reasons why:

1.To Avoid Spoliation of Evidence 

Defense counsel are often aggressive in arguing spoliation of evidence. 

Doctrine Of Superior Equitites Applied (But Questioned) in California Subrogation Case

April 10, 2007 / Writing and Speaking

Since 1938, California law has required that an insurer have superior equities in order to prevail in a subrogation action against a third party.  In other words, although an insurer might have a subrogation interest in the insured’s claim against the party that caused the loss,

California Supreme Court Holds Assignee Can Recover Brandt Fees

October 10, 2006 / Writing and Speaking

Introduction

Five Star Dye House, Inc. (Five Star) obtained a judgment against Luis Sanchez (Sanchez).  Sanchez then assigned to Five Star his rights against Essex, which had denied Sanchez’s tender of defense.  In return,

  • Chicago

    Illinois 60603

    10 South LaSalle Street

    Chicago, Illinois 60603

    T: 312.855.1010 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: Dennis D. Fitzpatrick

  • New York

    New York 10005

    28 Liberty Street 39th Floor

    New York, New York 10005

    T: 212.805.3900 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 212.805.3939 Office Managing Partner: Carl M. Perri

  • Mission Viejo

    California 92691

    27285 Las Ramblas

    Suite 200

    Mission Viejo, California 92691

    T: 949.260.3100 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 949.260.3190 Office Managing Partner: Ian R. Feldman

  • Florham Park

    New Jersey 07932

    100 Campus Drive

    Florham Park, New Jersey 07932

    T: 973.410.4130 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 973.410.4169 Office Managing Partner: Carl M. Perri

  • Michigan City

    Indiana 46360

    200 Commerce Square

    Michigan City, Indiana 46360

    T: 219.262.6106 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partners: Paige M. Neel, Kimbley A. Kearney

  • Milwaukee

    Wisconsin 53202

    250 E. Wisconsin Avenue

    Suite 1800

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

    T: 414.279.5525 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: James M. Weck

  • Stamford

    Connecticut 06902

    68 Southfield Avenue

    2 Stamford Landing Suite 100

    Stamford, Connecticut 06902

    T: 203.921.0303 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 212.805.3939 Office Managing Partner: Matthew J. Van Dusen

  • Tampa

    Florida 33609

    4830 West Kennedy Boulevard, One Urban Center

    Suite 600

    Tampa, Florida 33609

    T: 813.509.2578 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: Dennis D. Fitzpatrick Co-Managing Partner: Kelly M. Vogt

  • San Francisco

    California 94111

    100 Pine Street

    Suite 1250

    San Francisco, California 94111

    T: 415.287.2744 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 949.260.3190 Office Managing Partner: Ian R. Feldman

  • Houston

    Texas 77019

    2929 Allen Parkway

    American General Center, Suite 200

    Houston, Texas 77019

    T: 346.229.4612 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: Ramy P. Elmasri

  • Dallas

    Texas 75201

    325 N. Saint Paul Street

    Suite 3100

    Dallas, Texas 75201

    T: 469.942.8635 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: Ramy P. Elmasri

  • Boca Raton

    Florida 33434

    7777 Glades Road

    Suite 405

    Boca Raton, Florida 33434

    T: 561.765.5305 TF: 800.826.3505 F: 312.606.7777 Office Managing Partner: Dennis D. Fitzpatrick Co-Managing Partner: Kelly M. Vogt